Damage accrual in Behçet disease: Behçet's Syndrome Overall Damage Index (BODI) versus Behçet's Disease Damage Index (BDI).

OBJECTIVES: To assess the validity of Behçet's Syndrome Overall Damage Index (BODI) and Behçet's Disease Damage Index (BDI) as tools for the detection of damage accrual in Behçet's patients compared to Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI). Also, to evaluate the correlation and the interclass correlation among the 3 indices to find out their consistency. METHOD: A prospective cohort study was carried out on 102 adult Behçet's disease (BD) patients who were diagnosed according to the International Study Group criteria for BD. Disease severity and organ damage were assessed for each patient by VDI, BDI and BODI at baseline and 1-year follow-up visits. Damage accrual for each index was defined when there was an increase of at least 1 point (∆ ≥ 1) among the baseline and the follow-up visits. RESULTS: Correlations among the 3 indices were significant, with (r = 0.835, P < 0.001) between VDI and BODI, (r = 0.835, P < 0.001) between VDI and BDI, and (r = 0.844, P < 0.001) between BODI and BDI scores. A highly significant positive correlation existed between the 3 indices and age and disease duration. In contrast, the correlation with the BD Current Activity Form was non-significant, which indicates good discriminative validity of the 3 indices. Neuropsychiatric and ocular systems showed a strong interclass correlation among the 3 indices. Regarding detecting damage accrual, BDI was more sensitive than BODI and showed more agreement with VDI. CONCLUSION: BD damage indices, VDI, BODI and BDI, had good convergent and discriminative validity for the assessment of BD damage. BDI had more sensitivity than BODI to the detection of damage accrual.

Utility of neutrophil/albumin ratio and C-reactive protein/albumin ratio as novel inflammatory markers in Behcet's disease.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Behcet's disease (BD) is an autoimmune systemic inflammatory disease, and its exact pathogenesis is unknown. There are currently no specific tests to evaluate the disease activity of BD, making its management more difficult. This study aims to determine the neutrophil/albumin ratio (NAR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) to albumin ratio (CAR) and investigate their associations with clinical findings in patients with BD and to determine optimum cutoff levels of CAR and NAR. METHODS: The study included 75 consecutively recruited patients with BD with a mean age of 33.29±6.23 years and disease duration of 7.21±4.64 years, as well as 75 healthy participants. Clinical characteristics and laboratory data were obtained. Disease activity was assessed using the BD current activity form score (BDCAF). RESULTS: NAR and CAR were elevated in patients with BD compared with those of healthy controls (NAR: 1.08±0.34 vs. 0.607±0.06, CAR: 2.49±1.73 vs. 0.39±0.142; p<0.0001), as well as in active BD versus inactive BD. Both NAR and CAR were significantly correlated with CRP, active uveitis, and BDCAF score (p≤0.05). In patients with active BD, the cutoff value of NAR was >0.9744 (sensitivity: 89.74%, specificity: 80.56%), while that of CAR was >2.04 (sensitivity: 74.36%, specificity: 83.33%). CONCLUSIONS: NAR and CAR are both elevated in patients with BD and may contribute to its active state. NAR and CAR can be feasible and inexpensive markers for predicting BD activity.

Utility of neutrophil/albumin ratio and C-reactive protein/albumin ratio as novel inflammatory markers in Behcet's disease / Utilidad de la relación neutrófilos/albúmina y la relación proteína C reactiva/albúmina como nuevos marcadores inflamatorios en la enfermedad de Behçet

Introduction and objectives: Behcet's disease (BD) is an autoimmune systemic inflammatory disease, and its exact pathogenesis is unknown. There are currently no specific tests to evaluate the disease activity of BD, making its management more difficult. This study aims to determine the neutrophil/albumin ratio (NAR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) to albumin ratio (CAR) and investigate their associations with clinical findings in patients with BD and to determine optimum cutoff levels of CAR and NAR. Methods: The study included 75 consecutively recruited patients with BD with a mean age of 33.29±6.23 years and disease duration of 7.21±4.64 years, as well as 75 healthy participants. Clinical characteristics and laboratory data were obtained. Disease activity was assessed using the BD current activity form score (BDCAF). Results: NAR and CAR were elevated in patients with BD compared with those of healthy controls (NAR: 1.08±0.34 vs. 0.607±0.06, CAR: 2.49±1.73 vs. 0.39±0.142; p<0.0001), as well as in active BD versus inactive BD. Both NAR and CAR were significantly correlated with CRP, active uveitis, and BDCAF score (p≤0.05). In patients with active BD, the cutoff value of NAR was >0.9744 (sensitivity: 89.74%, specificity: 80.56%), while that of CAR was >2.04 (sensitivity: 74.36%, specificity: 83.33%). Conclusions: NAR and CAR are both elevated in patients with BD and may contribute to its active state. NAR and CAR can be feasible and inexpensive markers for predicting BD activity.(AU)

Introducción y objetivos: La enfermedad de Behçet (EB) es una enfermedad inflamatoria sistémica autoinmune y se desconoce su patogenia exacta. Actualmente no existen pruebas específicas para evaluar la actividad de la EB, lo que dificulta su manejo. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar la proporción neutrófilos/albúmina (NAR) y de proteína C reactiva (CRP)/albúmina (CAR) e investigar sus asociaciones con los hallazgos clínicos en pacientes con EB y determinar los niveles de corte óptimos de CAR y NAR. Métodos: El estudio incluyó a 75 pacientes con EB reclutados consecutivamente con una edad media de 33,29±6,23 años y una duración de la enfermedad de 7,21±4,64 años, así como a 75 participantes sanos. Se obtuvieron características clínicas y datos de laboratorio. La actividad de la enfermedad se evaluó utilizando la puntuación del formulario de actividad actual de la EB (BD Current Activity Form [BDCAF]). Resultados: NAR y CAR estaban elevados en pacientes con EB en comparación con controles sanos (NAR: 1,08±0,34 vs. 0,607±0,06, CAR: 2,49±1,73 vs. 0,39±0,142; p<0,0001), así como en pacientes EB activos versus EB inactivos. Tanto la NAR como la CAR se correlacionaron significativamente con la PCR, la uveítis activa y la puntuación BDCAF (p≤0,05). En pacientes con EB activa, el valor de corte de NAR fue>0,9744 (sensibilidad: 89,74%, especificidad: 80,56%), mientras que el de CAR fue>2,04 (sensibilidad: 74,36%, especificidad: 83,33%). Conclusiones: NAR y CAR están elevados en pacientes con EB y pueden contribuir a su estado activo. NAR y CAR pueden ser marcadores factibles y económicos para predecir la actividad de EB.(AU)

Validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease scale in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune inflammatory condition that causing disability and affection of patient's quality of life (QoL). Self-efficacy investigation helps us to detect the requirements of chronically affected patients and evaluation of self-care management programs. The aim of our study was to test validity and reliability of Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease (SEMCD-Arabic) in RA patients. METHOD: This study included 248 RA patients, carried out at Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Department. The SEMCD-Arabic Validity was assessed by correlating the SEMCD-Arabic scale with the validated Arabic version of the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire HAQ (MHAQ), the Arabic version of the Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) scale, and the Arabic version of Short Form 36 version 2 for quality of life (SF QoL). Internal consistency, test-retest reliability was assessed. RESULTS: Convergent validity was confirmed by a positive correlation between (physical, mental) component of SF QoL and SEMCD-Arabic (r = 0.918, r = 0.925) respectively, and negative correlation between MAF and SEMCD-Arabic (r = - 0.657) and MHAQ with SEMCD-Arabic (r = - 0.595). Discriminant validity confirmed by a significant negative correlation between visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, disease activity scale (DAS28), Morning stiffness, patient health, physician health, age, duration, and SEMCD-Arabic (r = - 0.1-0.7) (P < 0.001). Test-retest reliability was estimated which revealed a high interclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.87-0.997) indicating excellent agreement and internal consistency is acceptable as the Cronbach's alpha value (0.660 to 0.78). CONCLUSION: The SEMCD-Arabic questionnaire can be used as a valid and reliable measure for assessment of patient's self-efficacy in RA. Key Points • The SEMCD-Arabic questionnaire has a statistically significant validity in correlation with different clinical manifestations MHAQ, SF QoL, and MAF. • The Arabic SEMCD is highly reliable with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.660 to 0.78.